1. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Tantek Çelik

    10 years ago today the first #federated #IndieWeb comment thread was published and collected peer-to-peer IndieWeb replies across websites without any intermediary, silo or otherwise¹.

    2013-04-19 @eschnou.com posted a brief note on his personal site with #atMentions of a few domains (putting an '@' sign immediately before a domain name to indicate an explicit cross-web @-mention), which itself was also a first²

    "Testing #indieweb federation with @waterpigs.co.uk, @aaronparecki.com and @indiewebcamp.com !"

    When @aaronpk.com was notified and replied from his site within minutes³, it became the first peer-to-peer federated IndieWeb comment thread, at the time using h-entry and Pingback. I blogged about it a few days later⁴.

    Earlier this year I blogged more observations of all the user interactions that happened on that day and shortly thereafter to make this all work: https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention

    Unfortunately Laurent Eschnou’s original post is no longer up, and we only have the Internet Archive copy. However most of the IndieWeb reply posts are still up including Barnaby’s: https://waterpigs.co.uk/notes/1334/

    The oldest still working federated post and comment thread was second overall, unsurprisingly from @aaronparecki.com⁵, a whole 40 days after Laurent’s first.

    This is day 37 of #100DaysOfIndieWeb. #100Days #OpenWeb #federation #fediverse

    ← Day 36: https://tantek.com/2023/100/t1/auto-linked-hashtags-federated
    → Day 38: https://tantek.com/2023/110/t2/beyond-mastodon-indieweb-own-domain


    Glossary

    federation
    https://indieweb.org/federation
    h-entry
    https://microformats.org/wiki/h-entry
    Pingback
    https://indieweb.org/Pingback
    reply post
    https://indieweb.org/reply

    References

    ¹ https://web.archive.org/web/20130427010301/http://eschnou.com/entry/testing-indieweb-federation-with-waterpigscouk-aaronpareckicom-and--62-24908.html
    ² https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention
    ³ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/04/19/3/indieweb
    ⁴ https://tantek.com/2013/113/b1/first-federated-indieweb-comment-thread
    ⁵ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/05/21/4/xkcd
  3. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Tantek Çelik

    10 years ago today the first #federated #IndieWeb comment thread was published and collected peer-to-peer IndieWeb replies across websites without any intermediary, silo or otherwise¹.

    2013-04-19 @eschnou.com posted a brief note on his personal site with #atMentions of a few domains (putting an '@' sign immediately before a domain name to indicate an explicit cross-web @-mention), which itself was also a first²

    "Testing #indieweb federation with @waterpigs.co.uk, @aaronparecki.com and @indiewebcamp.com !"

    When @aaronpk.com was notified and replied from his site within minutes³, it became the first peer-to-peer federated IndieWeb comment thread, at the time using h-entry and Pingback. I blogged about it a few days later⁴.

    Earlier this year I blogged more observations of all the user interactions that happened on that day and shortly thereafter to make this all work: https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention

    Unfortunately Laurent Eschnou’s original post is no longer up, and we only have the Internet Archive copy. However most of the IndieWeb reply posts are still up including Barnaby’s: https://waterpigs.co.uk/notes/1334/

    The oldest still working federated post and comment thread was second overall, unsurprisingly from @aaronparecki.com⁵, a whole 40 days after Laurent’s first.

    This is day 37 of #100DaysOfIndieWeb. #100Days #OpenWeb #federation #fediverse

    ← Day 36: https://tantek.com/2023/100/t1/auto-linked-hashtags-federated
    → 🔮


    Glossary

    federation
    https://indieweb.org/federation
    h-entry
    https://microformats.org/wiki/h-entry
    Pingback
    https://indieweb.org/Pingback
    reply post
    https://indieweb.org/reply

    References

    ¹ https://web.archive.org/web/20130427010301/http://eschnou.com/entry/testing-indieweb-federation-with-waterpigscouk-aaronpareckicom-and--62-24908.html
    ² https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention
    ³ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/04/19/3/indieweb
    ⁴ https://tantek.com/2013/113/b1/first-federated-indieweb-comment-thread
    ⁵ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/05/21/4/xkcd
  4. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Tantek Çelik

    10 years ago today the first #federated #IndieWeb comment thread was published and collected peer-to-peer IndieWeb replies across websites without any intermediary, silo or otherwise¹.

    2013-04-19 @eschnou.com posted a brief note on his personal site with #atMentions of a few domains (putting an '@' sign immediately before a domain name to indicate an explicit cross-web @-mention), which itself was also a first²

    "Testing #indieweb federation with @waterpigs.co.uk, @aaronparecki.com and @indiewebcamp.com !"

    When @aaronpk.com was notified and replied from his site within minutes³, it became the first peer-to-peer federated IndieWeb comment thread, at the time using h-entry and Pingback. I blogged about it a few days later⁴.

    Earlier this year I blogged more observations of all the user interactions that happened on that day and shortly thereafter to make this all work: https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention

    Unfortunately Laurent Eschnou’s original post is no longer up, and we only have the Internet Archive copy. However most of the IndieWeb reply posts are still up including Barnaby’s: https://waterpigs.co.uk/notes/1334/

    The oldest still working federated post and comment thread was second overall, unsurprisingly from @aaronparecki.com⁵, a whole 40 days after Laurent’s first.

    This is day 37 of #100DaysOfIndieWeb. #100Days #OpenWeb #federation #fediverse

    ← Day 36: https://tantek.com/2023/100/t1/auto-linked-hashtags-federated
    → 🔮


    Glossary

    federation
    https://indieweb.org/federation
    h-entry
    https://microformats.org/wiki/h-entry
    Pingback
    https://indieweb.org/Pingback
    reply post
    https://indieweb.org/reply

    References

    ¹ https://web.archive.org/web/20130427010301/http://eschnou.com/entry/testing-indieweb-federation-with-waterpigscouk-aaronpareckicom-and--62-24908.html
    ² https://tantek.com/2023/014/t4/domain-first-federated-atmention
    ³ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/04/19/3/indieweb
    ⁴ https://tantek.com/2013/113/b1/first-federated-indieweb-comment-thread
    ⁵ https://aaronparecki.com/2013/05/21/4/xkcd
  5. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City’s owned dozens of phony luxury items including bags and jewelry federal autho to federal charges that she had put together a $5 million telemarketing scam targeted to swindle older people.

    The latest: The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City’s Jen Shah, 49, owned dozens of phony luxury items including bags and jewelry federal authorities seized during a raid of her Utah residence last year

    Among the fraudulent items of merchandise, which were mostly manufactured in China, included fake purses aimed to resemble products from high-end brands including Balenciaga, Chanel, Fendi, Gucci, Hermes, Jimmy Choo, Louis Vuitton and Valentino.

    The jewelry collection included counterfeit pieces made to resemble designers such as Bulgari, Chanel, Cartier, eVDeN EVE nAKLiyaT Dior, Gucci, Hermes, Louis Vuitton and Tiffany & Co.

    RELATED ARTICLES

    Share this article

    48 shares

    Mixed in with the phony items were actual pieces of luxury accessories and jewelry from brands such as Yves Saint Laurent, Versace, Gucci, evDEn eve nakLiYat Louis Vuitton and Prada, as well as pieces from her castmate Meredith Marks’ brand.

    Federal authorities took possession of all of the items amid a raid on the Bravo personality’s home in March of 2021 in the probe into her fraud case.

    After the holidays: Jen Shah’s trial date has been pushed back until next year, after she plead guilty to charges of organizing a $5million telemarketing scam that targeted hundreds of elderly people

    Approved: The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City star’s new court date is set for January 6, 2023

    Shah’s sentencing date has been pushed back until next year, after she that targeted hundreds of elderly people.

    The star’s new court date is set for , 2023, after the holidays.

    In court documents, obtained by , it was revealed that ‘Judge Sidney H.Stein approved the rescheduling on Wednesday, November 23.’

    In July, Shah plead guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, with the US attorney dropping her second count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

    Shah’s assistant Stuart Smith previously admitted his part in the same scam, and had been due to testify against his former employer, until her guilty plea.

    The US attorney’s office says Shah faces the maximum sentence of 30 years in prison, but NBC Connecticut reports that a plea deal will actually see her serve a maximum of 14 years.

    A few extra months of freedom: In court documents, obtained by Us Weekly , it was revealed that ‘Judge Sidney H.Stein approved the rescheduling on Wednesday, November 23’

  10. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Geralt_of_Razhia

    Hello all! Sorry for the long explanation, I searched a lot but didn't find anything useful so I thought every detail would matter. I've started learning programming with stm32 MCUs, I have a stm32f401ccu6 Black pill and a clone ST Link v2 programmer. - I have installed the latest st link driver and upgraded st link firmware to the latest possible version. - I have set up the wiring according to: https://waterpigs.co.uk/articles/black-blue-pill-stm32-st-link-connection/ I hope it is correct. ## Here's the problem: So yesterday I was hardly struggling to connect st link to st link utility (and keil), since it is now connecting fine I don't explain in detail but today after playing more with settings in st link utility and with reset and boot0 buttons I finally could connect to st link and successfully programmed blinky and the program was running without problem, putting the settings back to the original state didn't cause any error, pressing no button is required. To make sure I finally fixed the problem (while the board was connected to st link and to my PC) I started disconnecting and connecting st link from st link utility, in different states by pressing reset and boot0 buttons. SUDDENLY windows popped up a window and installed a driver! I guess "STM bootloader" and "ST link utility" now existing in windows devices in setting didn't exist there before. I can now successfully program the chip using st link utility, cube ide and keil and in st link utility I can see that the hex file has been correctly loaded to the flash, the problem is that **the LED isn't blinking anymore**! It is worth mentioning that while the board is connected the PC via usb, in addition to "STM32 STLink", "STM BOOTLOADER" is also added in device manager. Things I have tried: - trying to power cycle the MCU, holding boot0 button, powering off the board then powering it on. (Or holding boot0 and pressing and releasing reset button) - Powering the board up from a charger, from the PC, from st link. - Uninstalling STM bootloader from device manager (it keeps adding again) - used an external LED with another pin (I did the configuration in cube mx from the start) I think an easy explanation would be the clone st link and the cheap board, but the program was running perfectly fine before windows (and me!) screwed up something! And firmware is now getting uploaded successfully. Your help is very much appreciated. **EDIT:** I just tried reading boot0 button voltage (As I did some hours ago) then **the LED started blinking**!!! Someone please tell me what is going on here! My impression of STM32 was that it is very reliable, but what I'm seeing right now is the opposite. **EDIT 2:** In cube programmer I put the mode on "connect under reset" and while holding reset, pressed connect. The LED again stopped blinking, the MCU again is in a state that can not exit from. Knowing reading the voltage of boot0 button fixed the problem I tried again and I'm almost sure now that since some resistors are very close to some pins of that button, short circuiting the resistor and those pins fixed the problem. **EDIT 3:** I repeated the process in Edit 2 several times, I'm not exactly sure whether it's short circuiting the resistors with boot0, or reset button, or a combination of all of them that fixes the problem. Anyway the issue is solved but I don't know the reason, in the condition that I explained what happens to the MCU and why it only exit from that state with this solution?
    Bookmark: reddit.com/r/stm32f4/comm... https://waterpigs.co.uk/articles/black-blue-pill-stm32-st-link-connection/
  11. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Geralt_of_Razhia

    Hello all! Sorry for the long explanation, I searched a lot but didn't find anything useful so I thought every detail would matter. I've started learning programming with stm32 MCUs, I have a stm32f401ccu6 Black pill and a clone ST Link v2 programmer. - I have installed the latest st link driver and upgraded st link firmware to the latest possible version. - I have set up the wiring according to: https://waterpigs.co.uk/articles/black-blue-pill-stm32-st-link-connection/ I hope it is correct. ## Here's the problem: So yesterday I was hardly struggling to connect st link to st link utility (and keil), since it is now connecting fine I don't explain in detail but today after playing more with settings in st link utility and with reset and boot0 buttons I finally could connect to st link and successfully programmed blinky and the program was running without problem, putting the settings back to the original state didn't cause any error, pressing no button is required. To make sure I finally fixed the problem (while the board was connected to st link and to my PC) I started disconnecting and connecting st link from st link utility, in different states by pressing reset and boot0 buttons. SUDDENLY windows popped up a window and installed a driver! I guess "STM bootloader" and "ST link utility" now existing in windows devices in setting didn't exist there before. I can now successfully program the chip using st link utility, cube ide and keil and in st link utility I can see that the hex file has been correctly loaded to the flash, the problem is that **the LED isn't blinking anymore**! It is worth mentioning that while the board is connected the PC via usb, in addition to "STM32 STLink", "STM BOOTLOADER" is also added in device manager. Things I have tried: - trying to power cycle the MCU, holding boot0 button, powering off the board then powering it on. (Or holding boot0 and pressing and releasing reset button) - Powering the board up from a charger, from the PC, from st link. - Uninstalling STM bootloader from device manager (it keeps adding again) - used an external LED with another pin (I did the configuration in cube mx from the start) I think an easy explanation would be the clone st link and the cheap board, but the program was running perfectly fine before windows (and me!) screwed up something! And firmware is now getting uploaded successfully. Your help is very much appreciated. **EDIT:** I just tried reading boot0 button voltage (As I did some hours ago) then **the LED started blinking**!!! Someone please tell me what is going on here! My impression of STM32 was that it is very reliable, but what I'm seeing right now is the opposite. **EDIT 2:** In cube programmer I put the mode on "connect under reset" and while holding reset, pressed connect. The LED again stopped blinking, the MCU again is in a state that can not exit from. Knowing reading the voltage of boot0 button fixed the problem I tried again and I'm almost sure now that since some resistors are very close to some pins of that button, short circuiting the resistor and those pins fixed the problem. **EDIT 3:** I repeated the process in Edit 2 several times, I'm not exactly sure, whether it's short circuiting the resistors with boot0, or reset button, or a combination of all of them that fixes the problem. Anyway the issue is solved but I don't know the reason, in the condition that I explained what happens to the MCU and why it only exit from that state with this solution?
    Bookmark: reddit.com/r/embedded/com... https://waterpigs.co.uk/articles/black-blue-pill-stm32-st-link-connection/