Barnaby Walters

It seems my brother is not overly impressed with my heartfelt rendition of “Half Caste”.

13:14 19^th February 2013 (updated)
What is it called when you subconsciously expect a UI to be somewhere it isn’t, e.g. double-tapping a word in a dead tree book to get a definition, or expecting a "like/favourite" button in, e.g, an email client?

And no jokes about obsession :) it can't just be me.

23:29 18^th February 2013 (updated)
↪ Shane Becker: It kinda blows me away that there have been ~1600 downloads of my little gem that's very not done. Who does that? https://t.co/dDcIiAkj

Shane Becker yeah, where are all these #ruby apps consuming µf2?! My fairly complete #php µf2 parser has had 55 installs so far, probably mainly me updating it :)

22:40 18^th February 2013 (updated)
Feed the Demon by Robin Andrews #bookmark #capitalism #poem /cc joviansalak

20:59 18^th February 2013 (updated)
Tags and categories have different connotations. To me, tags are community, collaboration, flexibility, fuzziness, visibile metadata. Categories are authority, rigidity, structure, taxonomy. Tags can be found inside content (#hashtags), categories are separate, controlling entities. Content owns tags. People own tags. Categories own content. Authority owns categories.

Beware of vague naming — some software mistakes one for the other (e.g. Mediawiki categories are in fact many-to-many).

The organisational technique used doesn’t only have technical and usability implications, but social and philosophical (or pseudo-philosophical?) ones.

20:51 18^th February 2013 (updated)
↪ Erin Jo Richey: @BarnabyWalters Tags provide bottom-up structure and information architecture, categories provide top-down structure and IA.

.Erin Richey my reasoning is that tags are something you add to content, whereas categories are something you put content into. Tags -> content -> categories — so categories are higher up in the pecking order.

19:25 18^th February 2013 (updated)
↪ Erin Jo Richey: @BarnabyWalters Tags provide bottom-up structure and information architecture, categories provide top-down structure and IA.

Erin Richey well, that’s the sane, eloquent, rational way of putting it :)

19:17 18^th February 2013 (updated)
Tags enrich your content, categories demean it.

08:29 18^th February 2013 (updated)

Galopede

Trad. 2/2 G


M:2/2
L:1/8
K:G
dc|B2Bc A2AB|G2G2 G2AB|cBcd edcB|A2A2 A2dc|

Belgian Polka

Trad. 2/2 G


M:2/2
L:1/4
K:G
B>A GE|DE G2|FG A2|GA B2|B>A GE|DE G2|

Laura and Lenza

Trad. 2/2 C


M:2/2
L:1/4
K:C
ce ce|dg g/f/e/d/|ce ce|d/c/B/A/ GA/B/|ce ce|

Finnish Schottische

Trad. 2/2 Dmin From Finland (presumably)


M:2/2
L:1/8
K:Dmin
D2F2 AGFE|DFAd f2f2|g2ec Acef|edcB AGFE|

Rakes of Rochester

Trad. 2/2 G


M:2/2
L:1/4
K:G
d/c/|BG2D|E2 DG|FG CB|A/G/F/E/ Dd/c/|B G2 D|E2 DG|

Captain Driver’s Delight

Trad. 2/2 G


M:2/2
L:1/8
K:G
d2Bc d2de|dcBA B2G2|d2Bc d2g2|d2cB A4 :|

The French Assembly

Trad. 3/4 G French Waltz


M:3/4
L:1/8
K:G
c2 cB cA|B2 BA BG|G2 E2 E2|c2 cB cA|B2 BA BG|

Auvergne Polka II

Trad. 2/2 G French Polka.


M:2/2
L:1/8
K:G
D2EF G2G2|FGAF G4|ABcA B2G2|ABcA B2G2|

Auvergne Polka I

Trad. 2/2 G French Polka. Part Order: AABB


M:2/2
L:1/8
K:G
d2d2 B2 B2|G2G2 E2AB|c2A2 A2BA|1 GFGA BABc :|2GFGA G4 ||

Rufty-Tufty

Trad. Playford 2/4 G Early 17th C English from Playford’s Dancing Master
```
M:2/4
L:1/8
K:G
d2de|f2ef|ggf>e|1 d4:|2 d3 e/2f/2||
```
Lord of Carnarvans Jig

Trad. Playford 2/2 Gmix Early 17th C English from Playford’s Dancing Master
```
M:2/2
L:1/8
K:Gmix
B2G2 Bcd2|c2A2 ABcd|B2G2 d2ef|1 g4 d4:|2 g4 d2ef||
```
Mill Field

Trad. Playford 6/8 G Early English Dance, from Playford’s Dancing Master
```
M:6/8
L:1/8
K:G
g|a2b c’>ba|b>ag d’2b|a2f d2g|f>ef g2||
```